- MUSICBRAINZ PICARD PRESERVE THESE TAG SOFTWARE
- MUSICBRAINZ PICARD PRESERVE THESE TAG CODE
- MUSICBRAINZ PICARD PRESERVE THESE TAG LICENSE
- MUSICBRAINZ PICARD PRESERVE THESE TAG FREE
Can I copy a few records from a copyleft database and put them on my copyrighted non-copyleft homepage?.Can I copy two/all/a hundred/a few thousand/N records from a copyleft database and put them on my homepage with links to similar non-free databases?.Same as above, but now the Copyleft database also has non-factual copyrighted information such as biographies of the artists on the Audio CD?.Is an Open Source MP3 ripping program allowed to lookup an Audio CD at both the non-free database () with a _very_ restrictive license, the Public Domain licensed database (), and the Copyleft database ( )?.The big question is, to what level is it allowed to combine the information of these projects or is the mixed listing of copyleft and non-free URLs already a violation:-) For music information there are two GPL friendly projects, MusicBrainz, FreeDB versus for-profit companies and their databases: CDDB, Allmusic, Muze, Rollingstone, but also projects in the middle such as with almost 45.000 artists. The examples below might seem far fetched to some people, but they have all already presented themselves in practice.
MUSICBRAINZ PICARD PRESERVE THESE TAG FREE
Both points are lacking in the GNU Free documentation license, we specifically include them. You probably thought that this was not possible did ya? We feel a strong need for regulating of the right to destroy and to censor information.
MUSICBRAINZ PICARD PRESERVE THESE TAG LICENSE
We even feel the the GNU Free documentation license is not strong enough to protect the Freedom of users. Some (business) people feel the copyleft idea as to restrictive. If people think the existing licenses translated OK towards database we will gladly hear] for each example below if they are allowed or not. We will conclude this paragraph with examples that should indicate the limits of the licenses written outside the database domain. For database content you can copy a few records or all, link to non-free database records with a URL, create scripts that combine content within the browser, etc.
MUSICBRAINZ PICARD PRESERVE THESE TAG CODE
Source code behaves much more like a binary functions: you either used GPL code or not. Database content is much more dynamic when compared to source code and can be republished in various forms on the Internet. Those terms are essential to upholding the spirit of copyleft. Were is the location of the cover text when gazing at a Postgres database table? Other examples of problematic terms are: document, title page, secondary section, and invariant sections.īecause the OpenContent license and GNU Free documentation license also contain terms that do not translate to the database domain, it is impossible to define what constitutes a derived work and re-publication. The "Cover Texts" are certain short passages of text that are listed, as Front-Cover Texts or Back-Cover Texts, in the notice that says that the Document is released under this License. We now quote a part of the copyrighted GNU Free Documentation License for explanatory purposes. where as the database world speaks of record selection, database linking, data-mining and many other terms.
MUSICBRAINZ PICARD PRESERVE THESE TAG SOFTWARE
Free Software licenses speak of libraries, linking, binaries, etc. However these licenses do not properly describe the unique world of databases. The Free Content License exists now for a while, as well as the GNU Free Documentation license. The use of Free Software ideas outside the source code realm is still somewhat limited. Kernels, compilers, web servers, database servers form the heart of the Free Software world. Do we need a new license?įirst we define the license problem involving databases. Readers are assumed to be familiar with topics such as Free software, CopyLeft, GPL, and the difference with Open Source in general. The focus is on the requirements of a copyleft database license, called GPL Data License (GDL). A database is a highly structured collection of digital information. This document examines the issues involved in applying the ideas of Free Software and Open Source to the realm of databases. One of the most important philosophical and social issues confronting humanity in the beginning of the 21st century is the sharing of information. Case studies Database license white paper
0 kommentar(er)
